NOT KNOWN FACTS ABOUT H4831 VS H4831SC

Not known Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc

Not known Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc

Blog Article

Since there will not appear to be any "Formal" Load Data to choose from for this Load, can a few of you present a starting point with this mixture and matters to think about when working this Load up?

Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Physically, it's a shorter grain measurement, hence, the designation SC or small Slash. The shorter, more compact kernels allow the powder to stream with the powder measures extra effortlessly, assisting to alleviate the continuous slicing of granules.

It really is possible that no even further discussion is required, during which scenario we advocate beginning a different thread. If on the other hand you really feel your reaction is necessary you could even now achieve this.

Sweet!! I am going to choose some up and provides it a attempt. Thank you men, I value it! I will Allow you to know what I determine. I do have about a half pound of 4350 I can try out that first and find out what comes about.

Yup or it would not get the job done perfectly. And Considering that the OP contains a load using Varget I might try to find someone to trade with. May think of a acquire gain condition.

I do know, rough occasions. H4831SC will definitely do the job, I just failed to like the case density when loaded prolonged. I do not keep in mind powder charge off the best of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps which can be the place I ordinarily aim to be. With your scenario making use of what you've got (and what I should have carried out) I'd start with the end in the bearing surface from the bullet suitable for the shoulder/neck junction, h4831sc and flirt with extending seating depths from there when you finally discover a velocity node.

If there is no load data it truly is since this powder is not really appropriate for this cartridge. Commonly a single will likely not discover just one powder to suit all cartridges, and also the household of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you're inquiring about would not work.

While this is most likely real, there's a large amount more to it than simply not blowing by yourself up. He couldn't hit prairie dogs further than about 150 yards, so I am guessing that inconsistent combustion wasn't executing something favorable for his grouping means with People loads.

At this time applying IMR 4831 within a 300WSM, and find out the H4831sc is a well-liked choice for this caliber and yields a bit more velocity. Besides it being quick Slice, what's the real difference in both of these powders, and should I switch to H4831sc?

It can be humorous how through the years loading innumerable different cartridges in numerous h4831sc rifles that I haven't acquired acceptable finish outcomes with H-4831 or perhaps the limited-Minimize Edition.

This is an more mature thread, you might not get a response, and will be reviving an outdated thread. Remember to contemplate making a new thread.

Like everyone mentioned, the SC means “limited cut” which is a bit much easier to meter. Will make you question why they'd nevertheless make the standard just one.

Although IMR 4831 and H4831SC are distinct powders, you'll discover that in lots of occasions, where one of these is listed another is going to be likewise. Also, you will discover there is a fairly constant marriage in between them with regard to shown loads.

If I've a pound or two of the powder and obtain far more of the same, h4831 vs h4831sc only a unique lot amount, I'll blend all of them up in order that I've a homogeneous batch of powder with which to operate.

Report this page